In a society where discrimination is so prevalent, the
responsibility to become an individual global citizen becomes much more
essential. As Thomas Turino alludes to in his text, very rarely does one
individual make a macro change in a global sense single handedly; however, it
is through combined action that these macro changes are possible. Taking the
time to understand different lifestyles encourages cultural acceptance and
cultural growth.
Different
types of music have very different impacts on society. Studio-art music,
high-fidelity music, and presentational music all share the same ultimate goal
of personal gain through the acquirement of money. These capitalistic forms of
music are based on the individual and do not promote intimacy. From these types
of music, it can often be assumed that these countries are more developed. In
order to listen to high-fidelity music, a machine is needed to play the recording
of the song. Some of these machines like mp3 players and iPods can be
expensive, so a society dominated by high-fidelity music can be assumed to be a
society of greater wealth. On the other side of the spectrum, participatory
music has the means of globalizing and synthesizing cultures from all around
the world. Its primary message of preaching togetherness and solidarity cries
out for a globalized world without divisions of race, nationality, or religion
setting each other apart. Participatory music is often associated with less
developed countries that have less money due to their lack of capital. That
being said, I really doubt that they would change their culture if they did
have the resources to purchase an mp3 player. There is so much that can be learned
from understanding a particular society’s music. Although there are many
different types of music throughout the world, every culture values and can
relate to some form of music. In fact, some cultures put music and dance
extremely high on their priority list of priceless realms of life. Societal
values can easily be learned based on the music of a certain region. Lyrics in
high-fidelity songs can often give a good understanding of what some cultures
value. For instance, many people in the United States value friendship/family,
love and spirituality. Based on participatory environments, we can often learn
their values of solidarity in a local and global sense. Music influences
society by providing entertainment and a way of life for millions of people.
Small communities benefit economically from music performances near their town.
Larger cities draw in larger crowds who spend their money at local restaurants
and local hotels, which provide communities with more financial stability.
Music gets people who share similar interest and taste in music to think alike.
Its influence on society is honestly immeasurably great; the list could go on
and on. Although it is highly unlikely, a transformation of millions of social
cohorts to a much fewer social formations is the beginning to a more globalized
world. The participatory framework can alleviate large-scale problems through
small communities. Turino asserts, “For me, good music making or dancing is a
realization of ideal – Possible - human relationships where the identification
with others is so direct and so intense that we feel, for those best moments,
as if our selves had merged.” I really do believe that this assertion is true
in regard to music and its influence on society. People start to think together
when they music together.
In order to be a global citizen one
must be cognizant of where they stand with the rest of the world while being
open-minded and inquisitive to cultural difference. Being an effective global
citizen could involve a lot of small things: riding your bike to work instead
of releasing harmful emissions into the world’s atmosphere, purchasing local
produce at markets to help out your community economically while helping the
world by reducing harmful chemicals released into the environment through
planes and trucks, supporting local functions such as Bloomington’s
Contra-Dance, and being informed and accepting of different cultural values.
Being like Heinrich from The Punks are
Alright is a great way of being a globalized citizen. He works with less
fortunate people to improve the quality of their lives. While bettering their
lives, he also is accepting of their culture, which is clearly different than
his. The ideal globalized citizen does their part, which may seem ineffective,
but with combined efforts of other globalized citizens does make a large-scale
difference in the world for the better.
Effective
global citizenship involves doing your part. That is the overall main
responsibility. Combined efforts are the only method of successfully becoming
more globalized; it is a group effort. Additionally, it is everyone’s
responsibility to be culturally aware and accepting of everyone. Discrimination
destructs the world, so that is why it is so important to see everyone as
humans rather than belonging to different cultural cohorts. The more we know
about people, the more we humanize them and the more we humanize them, the more
we connect socially. If America were more inquisitive than we currently are
about different cultures, the rest of the world would be a lot different from
our perspective. Currently America values corporations much more than it values
individuals. This needs to change to make the world a better place. For
imagining the self in these circumstances, it may give some people a sense of
false hope. Although I feel as though everyone contributing will help the
situation on globalization, I am fully aware that there is no such thing as a
universal practice. Most people in developed countries will not abide by the
guidelines, which will hurt global efforts.
Overall,
the concept of globalization is set based on an existing utopian society.
Although the idea of globalizing sounds perfect, it is literally too good to be
true due to lack of participation. Although small communities do make an impact
on the world, its impact will only be noticeable through many communities doing
the same thing, and until that happens, globalization is just an abstract
intangibility.





